[armedbear-devel] BigNum question
archi.rudra at gmail.com
Tue Oct 9 19:51:12 UTC 2012
Thanks, that was my error. This flurry of emails made me go look at the
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Zach Beane <xach at xach.com> wrote:
> archisman rudra <archi.rudra at gmail.com> writes:
> > My confusion is whether it matters that 2147483648
> > < 1234567898723618080928927362387
> > Doesn't the type descriptor (INTEGER 2147483648) mean integers upto
> No, the INTEGER type specifier takes two arguments. The first one
> expresses the lower bound, and the optional second the upper bound. If
> the second argument is omitted, it defaults to *, meaning no upper
> (MOD 2147483648) is more what you're thinking of.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the armedbear-devel