[armedbear-devel] BigNum question
Erik Huelsmann
ehuels at gmail.com
Tue Oct 9 19:12:31 UTC 2012
Hi Archisman,
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:34 PM, archisman rudra <archi.rudra at gmail.com>wrote:
> Is this correct behavior?
>
> CL-USER(17): (type-of 1234567898723618080928927362387)
> (INTEGER 2147483648)
>
>
Yes: BIGNUM is defined as "INTEGER, but not FIXNUM". (INTEGER 2147483648)
is much more restrictive than BIGNUM: it disallows all negative values
which are part of the BIGNUM definition.
HTH,
Erik.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/armedbear-devel/attachments/20121009/deced85c/attachment.html>
More information about the armedbear-devel
mailing list