[armedbear-devel] special operators without a macro definition

Pascal J. Bourguignon pjb at informatimago.com
Fri Aug 3 14:04:54 UTC 2012

Here is a "bug-report"/enhancement suggestion:


The following special operators don't have a corresponding macro definition.


While the standard doesn't specify anything for special operators not in
the CL package, it would still be nice if they followed the same rule as
for CL macros implemented as special operators: Macro Forms
An implementation is free to implement any macro operator as a special operator,
but only if an equivalent definition of the macro is also provided.

since this would ensure that portable code walkers can be written.


__Pascal Bourguignon__                     http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.

More information about the armedbear-devel mailing list