On 23 May 2011 18:47, Mark Evenson <evenson at panix.com> wrote: > Bug reproduced, but hmmm… The "obvious" solution via the attached patch > causes our DEFPACKAGE form to go crazy, so this is going to take a bit more > of study. Oh? Damn, we need to coordinate. :P I put the same patch in, how did you notice the defpackage craziness?