[armedbear-devel] Long form of D-M-C
evenson at panix.com
Wed Aug 11 21:44:19 UTC 2010
Unbelievably, I seem to have [hacked the version of long
DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION from Sacla/XCL o pass the long form D-M-C ANSI
I'm slightly incredulous that my patch works, because I don't totally
understand the code I've integrated here. In particular, neither method
combinations which use CALL-METHOD with the optional NEXT-METHOD-LIST,
nor use of the MAKE-METHOD macro will work, although their
implementation would not be terribly hard if I have the basics correct.
An aside: The more I work with our CLOS, the more I want to
re-implement it from scratch, or at least separate the base out from the
AMOP as a starting point to clean it up. Maybe this wouldn't help as
much as I would hope, but reading clos.lisp is an exercise in
frustration that doesn't end in admiration for clarity.
So, I hereby solicit additional source of tests or failing test cases.
I can't promise rapid response to fix things, but I will get to them
If this work doesn't turn out to be too broken, I might commit to trunk
in the next few days if the other developers acquiesce, with the
rational that an incomplete long D-M-C implementation is better than none.
"A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before, but there
is nothing to compare to it now."
More information about the armedbear-devel