[armedbear-devel] Some thoughts on classloaders, ...

Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail.com
Tue Sep 22 08:32:32 UTC 2009

2009/9/22 Alessio Stalla <alessiostalla at gmail.com>:
> That's what I think too, however currently the compiler emits calls to
> loadCompiledFunction(classname) bypassing the standard classloader
> machinery.

That's odd. If we have a classloader present that's capable of loading
our fasls, JVM will consult that loader when it needs a class. Therefore there
should be no need to emit loadCompiledFunction calls, because the
loader will do that automatically?

More information about the armedbear-devel mailing list