[armedbear-devel] 0.18 and beyond
ville.voutilainen at gmail.com
Fri Nov 6 16:12:34 UTC 2009
2009/11/6 Matthew D. Swank <akopa at charter.net>:
> Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't believe we want to convert lisp code to java code in the
>> future. The ongoing desire
>> is to have less java and more lisp.
> Yes. Certainly less Java would make it easier to eventually
> target .NET (w/o using ikvm): another improvement in the list.
Parrot and native code are also on my (very) long-term list. ;)
More information about the armedbear-devel