[armedbear-devel] 0.18 and beyond

[Ville Voutilainen]

2009/11/6 Matthew D. Swank <akopa at charter.net>:
> Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't believe we want to convert lisp code to  java code in the
>> future. The ongoing desire
>> is to have less java and more lisp.
> Yes.  Certainly less Java would make it easier to eventually
> target .NET (w/o using ikvm): another improvement in the list.

Parrot and native code are also on my (very) long-term list. ;)