[armedbear-devel] progress on Maxima + ABCL -- light at the end of the tunnel!

Robert Dodier robert_dodier at yahoo.com
Mon Jul 27 04:41:05 UTC 2009


Hi,

I've compiled Maxima (from CVS) with ABCL (from svn)
and run_testsuite() shows just a few errors due to
different floating point results. Hurray!

The key change to Maxima seems to have been changing
EQ to EQUAL in a pattern-matching function ... 
In ABCL it appears that numbers are not necessarily EQ
so a lot of patterns failed. Since the pattern-matching
stuff is widely used in Maxima (especially integrals)
there were a lot of failed tests. Just that one change
seems to have fixed dozens of test failures!

I found it necessary to run the autoconf machinery
(sh bootstrap && ./configure at least; I ran make as
well, although I don't know if that's actually necessary,
and then I ran configure.lisp as described in INSTALL.lisp)
before compiling with ABCL via:
(require 'asdf) (asdf:operate 'asdf:load-op :maxima)
Without the autoconf stuff, src/autoconf-variables.lisp
has incorrect values, it seems.

Maxima + ABCL is extremely slow -- something like 7 times
slower than Maxima + Clisp, which is the slowest of the
established Lisp implementations I've tried (GCL, ECL,
SBCL, CMUCL, and Clisp). I'm working on Linux, maybe it
helps to run on Windows -- I'm thinking the Java
implementation might be faster. Just a guess.

I'm pretty excited about the possibilities here.
A long-term project is to organize Maxima into modules
in hopes of making it possible to load different modules
a la carte -- I think that might make it attractive for
bolting it onto different projects.

Thanks to the ABCL developers for all their work.

best

Robert Dodier
Maxima developer


      




More information about the armedbear-devel mailing list