[alexandria-devel] are relevant OnLispisms welcome?

[Nikodemus Siivola]

Samium Gromoff wrote:

 > There is a useful subset of the macros/functions in the
 > Graham's "On Lisp" which at least superficially appear to match
 > the criteria for becoming part of alexandria.
 >
 > Therefore the question: whether an effort of identification of
 > those and bringing them here would be considered positive?

Yes and no. Anything sane and sensible is welcome, but the
license of On Lisp examples is not suitable: verbatim copies
are not acceptable unless you get PG to pass the relevant bits
into Public Domain -- independent re-implementation is required.
(For trivial stuff that has been part of the Lisp folklore forever
this can be waived, I should think.)

Also, remember that anaphoric macros, continuations, etc. are out of 
scope for Alexandria.

Cheers,

   -- Nikodemus