From heow at alphageeksinc.com Mon Oct 11 20:13:49 2004 From: heow at alphageeksinc.com (Heow Eide-Goodman) Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:13:49 -0000 Subject: [admin] hosting videos In-Reply-To: <1075382515.545.20.camel@sushi> References: <1075382515.545.20.camel@sushi> Message-ID: <1097525346.1121.151.camel@sushi> Guys, You're currently hosting my project (the Lisp Resource Kit) and I'm VERY happy with the service, bandwidth and overall professionalism. Anyway, the ALU, along with the local user groups are looking for a place to host videos of various Lisp-geek demos and presentations. Presently the ALU lacks the bandwidth to host such items and I was wondering of you guys would be up for it. Expected usage would be 2 100MB uploads/month, ~30 downloads/month (3GB) for about 3GB storage/year. What are your thoughts on this? Do you have any bandwidth caps? - Heow -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From mmommer at common-lisp.net Mon Oct 11 22:17:10 2004 From: mmommer at common-lisp.net (Mario Mommer) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:17:10 +0200 Subject: [admin] hosting videos References: <1075382515.545.20.camel@sushi> <1097525346.1121.151.camel@sushi> Message-ID: Hi! Heow Eide-Goodman writes: > Guys, > > You're currently hosting my project (the Lisp Resource Kit) and I'm VERY > happy with the service, bandwidth and overall professionalism. Wow, on behalf of everyone involved: thanks! :-) > Anyway, the ALU, along with the local user groups are looking for a > place to host videos of various Lisp-geek demos and presentations. > Presently the ALU lacks the bandwidth to host such items and I was > wondering of you guys would be up for it. > > Expected usage would be 2 100MB uploads/month, ~30 downloads/month (3GB) > for about 3GB storage/year. > > What are your thoughts on this? Do you have any bandwidth caps? Yes, of the benign anti-{slashdotting|DoS} type. Currently our cap is 220Gb/month, simply because 200 is included in the hosting package, and the extra 20 is what I planed to afford. We currently use around 27 GB a month, and it is growing. A decent percentage of this BW use is backups, probably. So there is bandwidth for the movies. Storage is another issue, though. We have enough for a year, I gather. I sugest the following: we do it, and keep an eye on BW and disk usage. If it gets out of control, we ponder what to do then (after eventually getting them off the net, lest we trigger a shortage of SLIME). We could host the movies as a project - or we could also think of something else... Regards, Mario. From heow at alphageeksinc.com Mon Oct 11 23:22:58 2004 From: heow at alphageeksinc.com (Heow Eide-Goodman) Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 23:22:58 -0000 Subject: [admin] hosting videos In-Reply-To: References: <1075382515.545.20.camel@sushi> <1097525346.1121.151.camel@sushi> Message-ID: <1097536696.1276.208.camel@sushi> I'm pleased you're interested. I'm also thinking of a worse-case-scenario, we get /.-ed and blow the bandwidth out the window. Other than the obvious answer of removing the videos, what happens? Is the bandwidth capped or will just a nice-fat bill going to show up in the mail? In that case, I think it would be completely appropiate for the ALU to spring for an additional 220GB of bandwidth. Any idea on the costs associated with that? Also who's your hosting provider? - Heow On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 18:17, Mario Mommer wrote: > > Hi! > > Heow Eide-Goodman writes: > > Guys, > > > > You're currently hosting my project (the Lisp Resource Kit) and I'm VERY > > happy with the service, bandwidth and overall professionalism. > > Wow, on behalf of everyone involved: thanks! :-) > > > Anyway, the ALU, along with the local user groups are looking for a > > place to host videos of various Lisp-geek demos and presentations. > > Presently the ALU lacks the bandwidth to host such items and I was > > wondering of you guys would be up for it. > > > > Expected usage would be 2 100MB uploads/month, ~30 downloads/month (3GB) > > for about 3GB storage/year. > > > > What are your thoughts on this? Do you have any bandwidth caps? > > Yes, of the benign anti-{slashdotting|DoS} type. Currently our > cap is 220Gb/month, simply because 200 is included in the hosting > package, and the extra 20 is what I planed to afford. We currently use > around 27 GB a month, and it is growing. A decent percentage of this > BW use is backups, probably. > > So there is bandwidth for the movies. Storage is another issue, > though. We have enough for a year, I gather. > > I sugest the following: we do it, and keep an eye on BW and disk > usage. If it gets out of control, we ponder what to do then (after > eventually getting them off the net, lest we trigger a shortage of > SLIME). > > We could host the movies as a project - or we could also think of > something else... > > Regards, > Mario. > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From mommer at igpm.rwth-aachen.de Tue Oct 12 10:30:48 2004 From: mommer at igpm.rwth-aachen.de (Mario Mommer) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:30:48 +0200 Subject: [admin] hosting videos In-Reply-To: <1097536696.1276.208.camel@sushi> References: <1075382515.545.20.camel@sushi> <1097525346.1121.151.camel@sushi> <1097536696.1276.208.camel@sushi> Message-ID: Heow Eide-Goodman writes: > I'm also thinking of a worse-case-scenario, we get /.-ed and blow the > bandwidth out the window. Other than the obvious answer of removing the > videos, what happens? Is the bandwidth capped or will just a nice-fat > bill going to show up in the mail? The bandwidth is capped. A bill shows up through the mail, but it is a moderate one (for the excess 20GB). > In that case, I think it would be completely appropiate for the ALU to > spring for an additional 220GB of bandwidth. Any idea on the costs > associated with that? Also who's your hosting provider? Our hosting provider is STRATO GmbH. I at least am satisfied. I will contact you OOB wrt the costs. Regards, Mario. From sketerpot at gmail.com Thu Oct 14 20:20:35 2004 From: sketerpot at gmail.com (Peter Scott) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:20:35 -0600 Subject: [admin] New project: xml-psychiatrist Message-ID: <7e267a9204101413203e9a385f@mail.gmail.com> I have a project almost ready to release, xml-psyciatrist. It is a powerful XML validator written entirely in Common Lisp that makes DTDs and Schemas look weak and verbose. The source code and manual are almost ready to go (I'm still waiting for feedback on the draft of the manual). It will be run by existing user pscott. -Peter From mmommer at common-lisp.net Fri Oct 15 12:11:03 2004 From: mmommer at common-lisp.net (Mario Mommer) Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:11:03 +0200 Subject: [admin] New project: xml-psychiatrist In-Reply-To: <7e267a9204101413203e9a385f@mail.gmail.com> References: <7e267a9204101413203e9a385f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Peter Scott writes: > I have a project almost ready to release, xml-psyciatrist. It is a > powerful XML validator written entirely in Common Lisp that makes DTDs > and Schemas look weak and verbose. The source code and manual are > almost ready to go (I'm still waiting for feedback on the draft of the > manual). > > It will be run by existing user pscott. Sounds very good. What License do you plan to use? Regards, Mario P.S: Nice name :-)