On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Erik Enge wrote: > > Mostly MIT license. Some of it may have different licenses on a > > case-by-case basis, but that will be rare. > > As long as it is not more restrictive than the GPL (though LLGPL is > preferred) > I guess it would be ok. Same here. As long as they're DSFG-free. Cheers, -- Nikodemus