[admin] New project

[Nikodemus Siivola]

> Project name: unetwork

Sounds very good! I approve.

However, Have you considered using LLGPL instead of LGPL?

 http://opensource.franz.com/preamble.html

LGPL is ok, but subject to interpretation when used with Lisp due to it's
C-centric jargon. For example: is dumping a core static or dynamic
linking? What about fasl-loading? Are new methods dispatching on the
classes in the library work that uses the library, or work based on the
library?

Cheers,

 -- Nikodemus Siivola