Numpy and Common Lisp?

Daniel Herring dherring at tentpost.com
Wed Apr 12 04:18:47 UTC 2023


Hi Robert,

The answer to your original question appears to be no, so the conversation turned to brainstorming solutions.  However your question did not provide a clear scope and purpose or measure of fitness for such a development.

Answers to the following questions may help focus this conversation.

Why did you ask for the CFFI binding?

Do you want access to a bigger function library, better numeric performance, or something else?

Why would you prefer CFFI bindings to numpy over CFFI bindings to a custom kernel?

What schedule are you hoping for?

How would you value traits such as portability, performance, implementation effort, user effort, and schedule?

-- Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/pro/attachments/20230412/5eb696ec/attachment.html>


More information about the pro mailing list